Where is the EU’s Sérgio Vieira de Mello?

Posted by conorbjorn on 09/09/10
Tags: , , ,  

Samantha Power’s much-lauded 2008 book “Chasing the Flame” told the story of Sérgio Vieira de Mello: a charismatic Brazilian who rose the ranks of the UN to become its most revered diplomat and ultimate “go to guy”. Tragically whilst working as Kofi Annan’s Special Representative in Iraq in 2003, de Mello was killed by a suicide bomb attack. Power’s book, now made into a documentary by HBO, is an engrossing read and is as much a biography of the UN and its failings as it is of de Mello.

 

The book begins with Mello’s early life, from his time studying Marxist philosophy in the Sorbonne in 1968 (where he was received a permanent scar while protesting against the De Gaulle government) through to his early days at the UN. Although hired for his linguistic skills, his veracity and intelligence soon led to a permanent place in the office of the UN’s High Commissioner for Refugees.

The book then charts, in impressive depth, the missions undertaken by de Mello in places such as Lebanon, Bangladesh, Cyprus, Cambodia, Rwanda and East Timor. It provides fascinating evidence of how De Mello and his loyal team regularly flaunted the UN’s rules to repatriate refuges and cut deals with insurgents. However ultimately de Mello’s biggest realization, and the crux of the book is that his utopian view of the UN - that of an independent organization committed to its defending its beliefs - was largely misplaced. In reality the UN serves at the behest of its paymasters - the member states - and is easily ignored, which De Mello saw first hand in the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982.

Labeled a mixture of “James Bond and Bobby Kennedy” by acquaintances, de Mello comes across as charming action junkie who is more comfortable talking to violent revolutionaries in the jungle than making small talk at diplomatic functions. A vastly intelligent workaholic (he completed a PHD in philosophy in his spare time) he genuinely bled “blue and white”, considering himself a UN man first and a Brazilian second. For this reason he was shocked when his Brazilian nationality ruled him out of a potential promotion. His unique ability to gain the trust (and often genuine admiration and affection) of political leaders, rebel insurgents and internal UN staff, allied to his ability to “get things done” allowed him to overcome the UN’s inherent flaws and make real gains in places like East Timor.

The book is by no means a hagiography and Power is critical of De Mello’s earlier non-judgmental approach (mirroring that of the UN) and his dangerously cordial relationships with figures such as Slobodan Milosevic (which earned him the nickname Serbio). In addition, de Mello’s constant fear of being disliked hampered his ability to place logic before emotion on many an occasion. In his private life, blessed with movie star looks and a jet set lifestyle de Mello was an avid skirt chaser (albeit one who later reformed) and an absent father to his two sons.

It is an open secret that De Mello was hotly tipped to succeed Kofi Annan in the UN Secretary General post. However many analysts say that in reality his chances were limited. The US, stung by Annan’s gentle criticism over Iraq wanted a safe (read dull) candidate that would cause minimum fuss. In addition, several Asian countries insisted it was their continent’s turn to provide a candidate. De Mello met neither requirement. Current incumbent Ban Ki-moon met both. Despite widespread criticism over his role as the world’s “invisible man” he is tipped to win a second term. The contrast with De Mello could not be more striking.

 

The book’s most relentlessly depressing image is thus that of the UN, an organization routinely criticized for its inaction but one that is ultimately crippled by the economic and political limitations placed on it by its member states. It is an image that will ring true for observers of the EU and in particular observers of the EU’s foreign policy and nascent peace keeping missions. Like Ban Ki-moon, Catherine Ashton was hired for political reasons. While De Mello was horrified that his nationality could stand in the way of him getting a UN post, Ashton is no doubt aware that her’s was the key factor in her appointment.

While the EU’s political posts remain dominated by national politicking it would be nice to think that the newly formed European External Action Service will have room for young “Sergios” across Europe, who bleed “blue and yellow” to rise to the top and be able to argue for the EU’s place in the world with a “de Mello-esqe” conviction.

It would be nice to think that, but perhaps naive as well.


2 Responses to Where is the EU’s Sérgio Vieira de Mello? »»

  1. Comment by CarolHorner | 2010/09/14 at 11:37:03

    Thankyou for your comments, very thought-provoking.

    There has been a lot of concern over the stewardship of Mr Ban Ki Mun at the helm of the UN and that is unfortunately the case. Parhaps the time has come for a rethink here over the period of maximum tenure for the General Secretary and in that to suggest a maximum period of say 8 years and then no re-election of the same person to such a post again.

    The candidature of Sérgio Vieira de Mello was an unfortunate missed chance but then there are so many that could have equally aspired to the position. I was somewhat disappointed though that you only suggested a male to the position! I disagree and in this respect suggest that we might look at Mrs Dora Bakoyannis the former Greek Foreign Minister and previously Mayor of Athens for the position as a prime candidate. Would she be up for such a position? I am not privee to enquire but her wealth of experience personality and charisma would rise to the occasion and I feel we would all benefit.

  2. Comment by conorbjorn | 2010/09/14 at 23:39:12

    Hi there Carol,

    Thanks you for your post. It’s an interesting suggestion about the tenure. It seems utterly bizarre that somebody who receives the level of criticism that Ban Ki Mun does can be in line for such a swift reappointment. It just goes to underline the political aspect of the appointment but also the lack of interest of the wider public who should hold their elected leaders to account for such decisions.

    I must admit that my knowledge of Ms Bokayannis is somewhat limited but it is a very valid point about the lack of women candidates. In fact Ireland’s former president, Mary Robinson who preceded Mr De Mello as high Commissioner for human rights was also talked about as a potential candidate for Secretary General. Mrs Robinson however was often dismayed at the politicisation, slow pace, ineffectiveness and bureaucracy of the position and the UN as a whole . De Mello has since been followed by two other women, Louise Arbour and Navanethem Pillay. All this leads me to believe that we may well see a women SG in the near future but it will likely not be one with the experience, personality and charisma of Mr. De Mello or Mrs. Bokayannis.


Leave a Reply »»

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image

Advertisement